Jump to content
Macro Express Forums


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

393 profile views

UAMike's Achievements


Newbie (1/14)

  • Week One Done Rare
  • One Month Later Rare
  • One Year In Rare

Recent Badges



  1. Yes confidentiality is an issue... I wish I could show you so you'd have a better idea, but the best I could do right now is a few screenshots taken with my phone. I can't think off the top of my head of a web site that behaves like this... probably because it's not best practice to build sites this way. This is a good idea and I will try to experiment with neutral zones some more. In the attached screenshots, you'll see that I've clicked in such a way as to outline the outer border of this big box, which I now realize is embedded within a larger box that takes up the entire browser window. There is no clickable left margin outside of the outer box, and the slimmest of margins on the right side, although I think this is where the browser's scroll bar would be if the page was long enough. One new discovery is that there are buttons on the top and bottom of the page that are findable and clickable using the ctrl+f method. Since they're only at the top and bottom, though, it's they're not all that useful for tabbing to somewhere in the middle of the page.
  2. The Ctrl+f is the first thing I tried. That's my bread and butter for most things I try to do inside a web browser. It doesn't work because after I press ESC, pressing tab or shift-tab will bring me to the first or last field respectively.
  3. My employer started using a new web-based app and I need help on how I can focus on specific text fields. My go-to method in the past was to use the search function in Chrome to find specific text and then tab to the correct place from there, but it doesn't seem that this method will work in this new app. The reason this is not working for me is that the webpage has a massive embedded field where all the individual text boxes are located (Not sure what the right term for this is... but it has it's own scroll bar if that helps explain). So, when I search for specific text, as soon as I try to tab somewhere, it shoots me back to the first text field within this larger embedded box. I've tried a few other things so far... Just tabbing to the right field: I think this won't work because certain fields are sometimes greyed out and I can't predict when this will be the case. I might need to further explore this method to see if I can determine if this is possible. Using controls in MEP: I've never actually done this before, but following the MEP help file, I don't think it's possible because MEP isn't recognizing individual text boxes when I used the crosshairs to set the control. In my first attempt, I thought I had it working because it jumped to the right field, but I wasn't able to recreate this when I picked a different field to click on... not really sure what to make of this. Searching for pixel colors: I've used this in the past and it's pretty slow and unreliable. I know some people in this forum can attest to that. I wouldn't mind using this method if there just one or two fields I needed to get to, but that isn't the case here. Plus, I think the fact that there's a scrollbar involved would only further complicate things. Are there any other methods I should explore?
  4. I saw a macro on this forum some time ago that when through the steps of selecting a background color and I used it as the starting place for a macro that sets all of my custom colors. Instead of picking one of the set colors, it tabs over to the RGB fields and fills them in from integer values that I have defined in an array. This has to be done every time MEP is restarted. It works, but I haven't yet decided whether it's worth the trouble. As I am writing this, it is occurring to me that instead of setting the RGB values, you could instead use Hue/Sat/Luma and perform a calculation (let's say... divide luma by 2 or whatever you think looks nice) to get perfectly offset text/background colors.
  5. Thank you, this is what I was hoping to accomplish. I never knew what I would do with the "set integer to the length of a variable"... but now I know and it's a valuable tool that I can add to my arsenal. I will also have to explore what I can do with "Set to position of text in a text variable"
  6. I think I over-complicated my ask when I mentioned the bit about PDFs. The main point was that I wanted to extract values from a long string, which I do quite frequently in a number of macros that I use, except I was hoping to speed up the process by jumping to the end of the string.
  7. Part of one of my macros is dedicated to counting the number of pages in an embedded PDF document. This is accomplished in a chrome browser by issuing a Ctrl+A, saving the clipboard text to a variable %clipboard%, then running a loop that counts down and searches for the text "of 50" "of 49" "of 48" (ie. Page 1 of 48) etc. The macro itself works just fine, but is quite slow. I assume this is because it has to check the contents of a rather large string. I was wondering if there was a way to shorten the string to make the process quicker. The text "Page 1 of XX" always comes at the end of the string but it is impossible to predict how many characters will lead up to it, so I can't use the function to delete or copy part of a string. Is there a smarter way of accomplishing this task? If only MEP allowed you to modify a string starting at the end...
  8. lol yeah, I guess I'll just live with this problem. Some of these standard ASCII values seem a bit strange and not very useful, whereas I would think that ≥ and ≤ are more universally known and used 😩
  9. I've also tried using 242 and 243 without luck. Like you mentioned, it seems to end up as ò or ó
  10. Is MEP to handle "≥" and "≤" characters? When I save a string variable containing one of these, they inevitably get turned into "=". In fact, it doesn't even seem like the editor can handle these characters... they always just turn into the "=" symbol. I would like MEP to recognize these characters and then convert them to their text form. My thought was to use the command "Variable set to ASCII Char", but I don't believe that there is a number that corresponds to these symbols.
  11. @acantor @terrypin Alan and Terry, I've tested out both of these macros and they both work great! Many thanks for your hard work!
  12. This works really nicely! In order to bump the pointer to the next digit, I modified the command: Variable Modify String: Copy Part of %T1% starting at %N99% and 1 characters long to %T89%. This only works using 1 digit numbers, but it will work for my purposes. Thank you!
  13. I was trying to keep it simple for myself by only have 1 digit numbers, as this would work for my purposes 99% of the time. My plan was to use statements like: If Variable %string% contains "1" and I realized that this would get misinterpreted if I used two digit numbers. But it sounds like you're suggesting I use a space delimiter... can you give me an example of how this would work?
  14. I am trying to create a macro that takes a string of digits (1-9) input by the user and outputs it as a list in a grammatically correct format (using an Oxford comma if applicable). For example, the user inputs "12345" and the output is is "1, 2, 3, 4, and 5" "45" => "4 and 5" "7" => "7" "389" => "3, 8, and 9" Let's assume that the user only inputs a digit a maximum of one time (ie: no "1123") and would only enter the digits in numerical order (ie: "123", not "321") This is a macro I've wanted to make for a long time and I'm trying to determine what the best approach for creating it would be. Any thoughts/ideas would be appreciated.
  15. I'm glad I'm not the only one who has experienced a slow down with regards to mouse operations in W10. Unfortunately I can't access this forum at work and have no good/acceptable way of sending a sample macro to myself. But as you pointed out, the coordinate method sounds like a better solution and I am going to test that out!
  • Create New...