terrypin Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 I've been using script looking roughly like this: Repeat Until %PixelCol% Equals "1477631" Get Pixel Color at (%X%, %Y%) Relative to Screen into %PixelCol% Variable Modify Integer %X%: Increment End Repeat //Location identified etc But it seems very slow. I could get into a specific example, but thought I'd first ask here if others have noted similar behaviour? Is there perhaps a marked difference when using the Get Pixel Color at command (and changing the position), compared to using Get Pixel Color Beneath the Mouse (and moving the mouse cursor)? BTW, IMO the latter does have the advantage while testing that you can more easily see what the macro is doing, because of the moving mouse cursor. -- Terry, East Grinstead, UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.