Tupman Posted October 6, 2013 Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 Hi to everybody. I am trying to make the transition from ME v 3.6 to ME Pro. I engage some difficulties when I try to load the macrofile I build build over the last years in ME (some 200 macro's, some very short, some long and complicated). When importing my macrofile in ME Pro the program likes to add an extra Text Type command (typing />) to each separate macro. Very inconvenient. Is this a known issue ? What can I do ? Can I expect other "phantom commands" ? Thanks for every answer. I'll attach a pdf which shows the difference between the ME 3.6 and the Pro version of the same macro Mart Tupman ME types by itself.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cory Posted October 7, 2013 Report Share Posted October 7, 2013 I have never heard of that happening. I suggest you contact ISS support via their website. They're very helpful and responsive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tupman Posted October 12, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 12, 2013 Thanks Cory, contacted ISS 5 days ago. No response yet, I'll try again. Mart Tupman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 I contacted our support department to ask about this. We received your email question on October 7 and a reply was sent the same day. Please check your junk mail folders to see if the response was caught by spam filters. You may want to add the email address info at wintools dot com to your email whitelist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cory Posted October 16, 2013 Report Share Posted October 16, 2013 Thanks for following up on this Kevin. I'm constantly plagued by this same problem especially doing batch emails for my clients. IMHO spam filters are the 'cure' that's worse than the disease. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul Posted October 19, 2013 Report Share Posted October 19, 2013 Thanks for following up on this Kevin. I'm constantly plagued by this same problem especially doing batch emails for my clients. IMHO spam filters are the 'cure' that's worse than the disease. Without using (or being able to use) any spam filters in Gmail, I find its ability to detect Spam almost faultless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cory Posted October 21, 2013 Report Share Posted October 21, 2013 Most are very expert at detecting spam. The problem is the large number of false positives. But I think Google is very good at limited false positives but other mail providers or even the anti-spam software people buy and run on the desktop are often terrible. I can't tell you how many important corporate emails were missed because they ended up the recipients spam folder. I just wish the word would agree on some method of validating servers. SPF is close but there needs to be something more formal. Having said that I've seen span percentages at my clients drop from the near 90% down into the teens lately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.